WIP convert Manager to use ThreadPool
valgrind seems to report memory issues, and documentation may need more updating.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e9e18a964
commit
f44d2f8c7b
2 changed files with 436 additions and 399 deletions
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
|
@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ TEST(EC, MultiThreaded)
|
|||
c->y = 2;
|
||||
},
|
||||
nullptr,
|
||||
2
|
||||
true
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < 17; ++i)
|
||||
|
@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ TEST(EC, MultiThreaded)
|
|||
c->y = 4;
|
||||
},
|
||||
nullptr,
|
||||
8
|
||||
true
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
|
||||
|
@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ TEST(EC, MultiThreaded)
|
|||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
manager.callForMatchingFunctions(2);
|
||||
manager.callForMatchingFunctions(true);
|
||||
|
||||
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < 17; ++i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ TEST(EC, MultiThreaded)
|
|||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
manager.callForMatchingFunction(f1, 4);
|
||||
manager.callForMatchingFunction(f1, true);
|
||||
|
||||
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < 17; ++i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ TEST(EC, MultiThreaded)
|
|||
manager.deleteEntity(i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
manager.callForMatchingFunction(f0, 8);
|
||||
manager.callForMatchingFunction(f0, true);
|
||||
|
||||
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ TEST(EC, ForMatchingSignatures)
|
|||
c0->y = 2;
|
||||
}),
|
||||
nullptr,
|
||||
3
|
||||
true
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
for(auto iter = cx.begin(); iter != cx.end(); ++iter)
|
||||
|
@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ TEST(EC, forMatchingPtrs)
|
|||
&func0
|
||||
);
|
||||
manager.forMatchingSignaturePtr<TypeList<C0, T0> >(
|
||||
&func1
|
||||
&func1, nullptr, true
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
for(auto eid : e)
|
||||
|
@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ TEST(EC, forMatchingSimple) {
|
|||
C0 *c0 = manager->getEntityData<C0>(id);
|
||||
c0->x += 10;
|
||||
c0->y += 10;
|
||||
}, nullptr, 3);
|
||||
}, nullptr, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// verify
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ TEST(EC, forMatchingIterableFn)
|
|||
c->x += 100;
|
||||
c->y += 100;
|
||||
};
|
||||
manager.forMatchingIterable(iterable, fn, nullptr, 3);
|
||||
manager.forMatchingIterable(iterable, fn, nullptr, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ TEST(EC, forMatchingIterableFn)
|
|||
c->x += 1000;
|
||||
c->y += 1000;
|
||||
};
|
||||
manager.forMatchingIterable(iterable, fn, nullptr, 3);
|
||||
manager.forMatchingIterable(iterable, fn, nullptr, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ TEST(EC, MultiThreadedForMatching) {
|
|||
EXPECT_TRUE(manager.isAlive(first));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(manager.isAlive(second));
|
||||
|
||||
manager.callForMatchingFunction(fnIdx, 2);
|
||||
manager.callForMatchingFunction(fnIdx, true);
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(manager.isAlive(first));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(manager.isAlive(second));
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue